Menu
Close
Cirebon Times

Logical and Civilized

Rashod Bateman Faces Uncertain Fantasy Role Against Falcons

Smallest Font
Largest Font

Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Rashod Bateman is available for the team's Week 5 matchup against the Atlanta Falcons after recovering sufficiently from a shoulder issue, but uncertainty at quarterback could limit his production. With Lamar Jackson sidelined during practice because of an ankle injury, Tyler Huntley has taken first-team repetitions, raising concerns about Baltimore's passing attack and Bateman's fantasy football outlook.

According to CBS Sports, Bateman was initially listed as a limited participant Wednesday, Oct. 7, before completing Thursday's practice. He also participated fully Friday, Oct. 9, and was left off the final injury report, confirming his availability for Sunday's game in Atlanta.

Atlanta's defensive numbers offer Bateman an appealing matchup, according to DK Network's Week 5 analysis published Oct. 11. The Falcons have allowed wide receivers an average of 38.5 points per game in point-per-reception formats, compared with the league average of 32.0.

The same analysis found that Atlanta had surrendered 25.2 targets, 195.2 receiving yards and 146.5 air yards per game to wide receivers. Those figures exceed league averages of 18.2 targets, 151.3 receiving yards and 104.4 air yards. The Falcons had also allowed 19 red-zone targets to receivers, more than twice the league average.

Atlanta's defensive production requires context, however. Its first four opponents were Pittsburgh, Carolina, Green Bay and New Orleans, and opposing teams averaged 276.5 passing yards per game, 18% above the league average. Carolina and New Orleans have particularly productive passing offenses, according to the analysis, while Atlanta cornerback A.J. Terrell Jr. is on injured reserve with a groin injury.

Bateman's downfield role gives him potential in the matchup. According to DK Network, he has accounted for 25.3% of Baltimore's air yards while receiving 14.7% of the team's targets. He has caught 11 of 15 targets for an average of 15.5 yards per reception.

His production has fluctuated with the availability of fellow wide receiver Zay Flowers. Bateman scored 21.8 PPR points when Flowers missed Week 2, but managed just 5.7 and 6.6 points in the two games after Flowers returned. Bateman received only two targets against Tennessee in Week 4.

Flowers' status remains relevant to Bateman's expected workload because the Baltimore receiver has been dealing with a foot injury. DK Network's analysis identifies Flowers' absence as a potential opportunity for Bateman to assume a larger role, although the quarterback situation remains a separate concern.

Huntley's possible promotion complicates that outlook. Baltimore averaged 241.5 passing yards per game and posted a 118.4 team passer rating, figures established with Jackson operating the offense. The Ravens also averaged 26.2 passing attempts per game, leaving limited volume for additional receivers if the passing game becomes less productive.

Mark Andrews has drawn 24 targets, representing a 23.5% share, while Flowers averages 7.3 targets per game when active, according to DK Network. Those established roles could leave Bateman with fewer opportunities if both players are available.

NBC Sports assessed Bateman's prospects cautiously in its Oct. 9 report, noting that Jackson's potential absence could reduce the receiver's fantasy appeal. Sports Yahoo similarly reported that Bateman had fully participated in practice and could receive a few targets, describing him as a possible No. 5 receiver in fantasy leagues.

DK Network classified Bateman as a borderline starting option for Week 5, with his value depending heavily on the matchup and the availability of Jackson and Flowers. A Flowers absence could increase Bateman's opportunities, while both Flowers playing and Jackson missing the game would leave Bateman with a less reliable fantasy floor.

Follow cirebontimes.com Add to preferred sources on Google
Editors Team
Daisy Floren

What's Your Reaction?

  • Like
    0
    Like
  • Dislike
    0
    Dislike
  • Funny
    0
    Funny
  • Angry
    0
    Angry
  • Sad
    0
    Sad
  • Wow
    0
    Wow

Most Viewed